Entities

Facs

Tillich Lectures

Transcript

[23]

Finally, the Protestant who is not a Fundamentalist, or a Roman Catholic, must be aware in every moment of his religious life of this risk of faith, and he must ask himself: “Why can I make of risk?” [probably: “Why should I take this risk?"--Ed.] This leads to the question, “Are there criteria?,” and “What is the real risk? What do we risk if we affirm something concrete as our ultimate concern?” The answer is obvious: We risk ourselves, because ultimate concern is a matter of a total surrender of the centered personality in all sides of his existence. Such a total surrender, if it is to an idolatric reality, means self-destruction in the long run. Now you can observe this especially well in all periods of history. I come back to the example of success.

Some of you may have read this book, which was also in a movie: c.1 There you have the description of a successful businessman, a banker, who somehow realizes, at the top of his success, that he has been driven in a direction from which there is no return any more to a life of more meaning than the life which he has to lead from now on. It is the risk of falling into complete emptiness, when your ultimate concern proves not to have been really ultimate but very preliminary and vanishing, especially in the moment in which the promise which it implies is fulfilled.

You could observe the same thing with the breakdown of the two totalitarian minds in our period: the Nazis and the Communists in our Western society. For many in the last decades these were matters of ultimate concern, and they really meant it as ultimate concern, as total surrender. It was a pact with a demonic power, like in h i: the pact with the devil2 is a symbol for the possibility of having an ultimate concern which is not really ultimate, and then one day the lack of real ultimacy becomes visible! And I can witness to the breakdown of the personalities, of their center, of their will to live, of their courage of self-affirmation, after they had given their totality to a destructive faith, which was first glorified ecstatically and then proved to be demonic and destructive because it was not the true ultimate.

Now this is an experience which can reveal the meaning of faith better than many chapters of theologians, Church Fathers, and even the Biblical literature, which cannot be understood if we have no keys to it out of our own experience, and this


Footnotes, Editorial notes

1Point of no Return is a 1949 novel by John P. Marquand about a successful Manhattan banker haunted by his humble New England roots. Charles Gray grew up in the small town of Clyde, Massachusetts, and worked long and hard to become vice president of the private Stuyvesant Bank in Manhattan. But at this crucial moment in his career, when he should be focusing on discerning his boss's intentions and prevailing over his main rival for promotion, Charles is hopelessly distracted by his past as a member of the lower upper class. The play was adapted for the theater by Paul Osborne and later made into a film.
2The pact with the devil appears in Goethe’s Faust. Der Tragödie erster Teil (1808) in the scene “Studierzimmer II.” In it, Faust makes a bet with Mephistopheles, agreeing to sell him his soul the moment he is so captivated by the present that he longs for it to last forever: “Stay a while! You are so beautiful! ("Verweile doch! du bist so schön!")”. Tillich drew on the Faust theme and demonology in various ways in his work and also influenced Thomas Mann’s adaptation of the tragic life of the artist Adrian Leverkühn in Doctor Faustus (1947).

Register

aFaith
bUltimate_Concern
cMarquand, Point of no return., 1949
dUltimate_Concern
eNazism
fCommunism
gUltimate_Concern
hGoethe, Johann Wolfgang von
iGoethe, Faust. Eine Tragödie, None
jDevil
kFaith
lDemonic

Entities

Keywords

Persons

Literature

TL-0026.pdfTL-0025.htmlTL-0027.html