<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="L10507.xml" xml:base="https://tillich-briefe.acdh.oeaw.ac.at" prev="L10506.xml" next="L10508.xml">
   <teiHeader>
      <fileDesc>
         <titleStmt>
            <title>Brief von Paul Tillich an L. Fahs vom 26. November 1940</title>
            <author ref="#tillich_person_id__1928">Paul Tillich</author>
            <respStmt>
               <resp>Editor</resp>
               <name key="https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3962-1240">Manuel Inselmann</name>
            </respStmt>
         </titleStmt>
         <editionStmt>
            <edition>
               <title type="editionstitel">Edition der Korrespondenz von Paul Tillich
                  1933-1951</title>
            </edition>
         </editionStmt>
         <publicationStmt>
            <publisher>
               <name>Institut für Systematische Theologie und Religionswissenschaft</name>
               <address>
                  <street>Schenkenstraße 8-10</street>
                  <postCode>1010</postCode>
                  <placeName ref="#tillich_place_id__470">
                     <settlement>Wien</settlement>
                     <country>Österreich</country>
                  </placeName>
               </address>
            </publisher>
            <availability>
               <licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Creative Commons
                  Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)</licence>
            </availability>
         </publicationStmt>
         <sourceDesc>
            <msDesc type="typescript">
               <msIdentifier>
                  <country>USA</country>
                  <settlement ref="#tillich_place_id__82">Cambridge, MA</settlement>
                  <institution>Harvard University</institution>
                  <repository>Harvard Divinity School Library</repository>
                  <collection>Tillich, Paul, 1886-1965. Papers, 1894-1974.</collection>
                  <idno>bMS 140(4)</idno>
               </msIdentifier>
               <physDesc>
                  <p>Brief, maschinenschriftlich</p>
                  <!-- SIEHE DAZU PHYSDECS-DOKUMENT AUF SERVER -->
               </physDesc>
            </msDesc>
         </sourceDesc>
      </fileDesc>
      <encodingDesc>
         <projectDesc>
            <p>online-Edition: Edition der Korrespondenz von Paul Tillich 1933-1951.</p>
         </projectDesc>
         <editorialDecl>
            <p>Die Ausgabe folgt folgenden Editorischen Richtlinien des DTA-Basisformats. Vgl.
               https://www.deutschestextarchiv.de/doku/basisformat/</p>
         </editorialDecl>
      </encodingDesc>
      <profileDesc>
         <correspDesc>
            <correspAction type="sent">
               <persName ref="#tillich_person_id__1928">Paul Tillich</persName>
               <date when="1940-11-24">24.11.1940</date>
            </correspAction>
            <correspAction type="received">
               <persName ref="#tillich_person_id__4071">S. L. Fahs</persName>
            </correspAction>
         <correspContext><ref type="belongsToCorrespondence" target="#corresp__tillich_person_id__4071">Korrespondenz mit S. L. Fahs</ref><ref subtype="previous_letter" type="withinCorrespondence" source="#corresp__tillich_person_id__4071" target="L10506.xml">Brief von L. Fahs an Paul Tillich vom 24. November 1940</ref><ref subtype="previous_letter" type="withinCollection" target="L10506.xml">Brief von L. Fahs an Paul Tillich vom 24. November 1940</ref><ref subtype="next_letter" type="withinCollection" target="L10508.xml">Brief von Hannah Tillich und Paul Tillich an Mitglieder der Columbia-Union Discussion Group vom 03. Dezember 1940</ref></correspContext></correspDesc>
         <langUsage>
            <language ident="en">Englisch</language>
         </langUsage>
      <creation><date type="sort" when="1940-11-24"/></creation></profileDesc>
      <revisionDesc status="approved">
         <change who="MI" when="2025-11-08">Initiale Auszeichnung des Transkripts</change>
      </revisionDesc>
   </teiHeader>
   <text type="letter">
      <body>
         <div type="writingSession">
            <pb n="1"/>
            <opener><dateline><date when="1940-11-26">November 26. 40.</date></dateline>
               <lb/><rs ref="#tillich_person_id__4071" type="person">Mrs. S.L. Fahs.</rs><lb/>
               99 Claremont Ave<lb/>
               <rs ref="#tillich_place_id__319" type="place">New York City</rs>
               <salute>Dear <rs ref="#tillich_person_id__4071" type="person">Mrs. Fahs</rs>:</salute>
            </opener>
            <p>Many thanks for your letter which I read with the greatest interest and with the
               certain hope to have very soon an occasion to discuss it with you. For the time being
               I only like to deal with one of the paragraphs because it is based on a
               misunderstanding. I certainly did not want to say that the religious educators of any
               type have no personal religion, just the opposite is true; the seriousness of which
               the whole group deals with the problem of religious education always has found my
               full admiration. The point I made in this respect was that our period has all
               different types of religion and that the mind of everybody is split between different
               types. This is even more true of parents who have never dealt especially with
               religious problems and do not know what to give their children because they have no
               powerful religious symbols and rites themselves. I wanted to give a criticism of our
               period with respect to uniting symbols of that strength which we find in earlier
               periods of history. My purpose was not to criticize the religious educators, parents
               as well as professional educators, but on the contrary, to apologize for them because
               they can not be made responsible for the insatisfactory situation of the Church as a
               whole. I feel myself entirely under this judgement which has the character of an
               historical destiny to be conquered by new prophetic movements. I think the
               educational development is very good but the tremendous difficulties of our education
               is not the educational method but the religious content which is given to us by
               history or which is taken away from us by history and which can not be created by
               education. This was the meaning of the point you referred to. With respect to all the
               other points we really should have a discussion as soon as possible.</p>
            <closer>
               <salute>Very cordially yours</salute>
               <signed><rs ref="#tillich_person_id__1928" type="person"><hi rend="hand">Paul Tillich</hi></rs></signed>
            </closer>
         </div>
      </body>
   <back><listPerson><person xml:id="tillich_person_id__1928">
                  <persName>Tillich, Paul</persName>
                  <birth>
                     <date>1886-08-20</date>
                     <settlement>
                        <placeName>Starzeddel, Niederschlesien (heute Polen)</placeName>
                     </settlement>
                  </birth>
                  <death>
                     <date>1965-10-22</date>
                     <settlement>
                        <placeName>Chicago, Illinois, USA</placeName>
                     </settlement>
                  </death>
                  <occupation>Theologe, Religionsphilosoph und Pfarrer</occupation>
                  <idno type="gnd">https://d-nb.info/gnd/118622692</idno>
                  <note type="bio">
                     <p>Paul Tillich (20. August 1886 – 22. Oktober 1965) war ein deutscher evangelischer Theologe und Religionsphilosoph. Nach seiner Tätigkeit als Feldprediger im Ersten Weltkrieg lehrte er an verschiedenen Universitäten in Deutschland, bis er 1933 emigrieren musste und in den USA wirkte, unter anderem in New York, Harvard und Chicago. Tillich entwickelte eine Theologie der Kultur und verstand Religion als das „was uns unbedingt angeht“. In seiner „Systematic Theology“ formulierte er die Methode der Korrelation und deutete Gott als „Macht des Seins“. Seine Arbeiten verbinden Theologie, Philosophie und Existenzdenken und hatten großen Einfluss auf das religiöse Denken der Moderne.</p>
                  </note>
               </person>
               <person xml:id="tillich_person_id__4071">
                  <persName>Fahs, S. L.</persName>
               </person>
               </listPerson><listPlace><place xml:id="tillich_place_id__319">
                  <placeName>New York City</placeName>
                  <location type="coords">
                     <geo>40.71427 -74.00597</geo>
                  </location>
                  <idno type="geonames">https://sws.geonames.org/5128581/</idno>
                  <idno type="wikidata">http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q60</idno>
               </place>
               </listPlace></back></text>
</TEI>